In class on today, it was brought to our attention that
Socrates, who is arguably one of the best philosophers was charged with two
crimes that ultimately lead to his death. Socrates was charged with corrupting
the youth in Athens and impiety/not believing in the gods of the state. These
crimes came up because authorities thought that the way he was teaching was
essentially mental abuse. In my eyes, this makes absolutely no sense because
the children were not forced to go to the workshops with him, these children
voluntarily went. No one would voluntarily do something if they felt as if it
was causing pain upon them. The jurors in Athens did not see this the same way and
the overall vote was to kill Socrates for the crimes he committed. A few short
days after his trail, he drank poison hemlock which shut down all of his systems
and that was the end of Socrates.
Socrates
should not have been found guilty for helping and teaching the youth. Athens
liked to produce very smart children and Socrates was helping this happen but
because of the way he did it, he was sentenced to death. Just because people
couldn’t see eye to eye with the philosopher, he was killed, which does not
make any sense. The ultimate decider on whether or not he should have been killed
is how the children felt about him. If they thought he was aggressive and forceful
than, he should have been killed. If they didn’t feel this way, killing
Socrates was very inappropriate and should have been a crime in itself. I know
that I would have voted him to be innocent because all he was doing was
bettering the future of Athens society.
No comments:
Post a Comment